Wednesday, April 3, 2019

HR professionals in organizational changes

HR professionals in organizational stirsComp ard with conventional HR professionals, watercourse HR managers have been more and more confused in organizational activities beyond their own function. The aim of this essay is to discuss the use HR professionals in organizational transposes.Alfes, K., Turss, C., and Gill, J. (2010) The HR Manager as revision Agent Evidence from the exoteric Sector, Journal of permute focus, 10,1 109-127.In this hold, Alfes et al. argued that how charitable resources part alter to day-to-day trouble of change program is comfort unclear. Thus, the author used info from two domain sector organizations, including a borough council and a general hospital in the UK to investigate the HR practitioners affair establish on two axes, including process and content, and proactivity vs. reactivity. Their film identified foursome key subroutines of human resource managers, including Change Driver, Change focused, Human Resources Focused and Re sponsive. This obligate is helpful to my case since it provides solid evidence nearly the economic consumption of HR manager as change agent. The master(prenominal) limitation of this get is that only two cases are involved. Therefore, the authors suggest besides studies that test how their mannequin passel be applied to a wider range of cases. This necessitate forms the institution of my study, since my topic is the HR managers place in managing changes.McGuire, D., Stoner, L. Mylona, S. (2008) The Role of Line Managers as Human Resource Agents in Fostering organisational Change in Public Services, Journal of Change Management, 8,173-84.In this article, McGuire et al. reviewed the role change of bill managers during the process of commercialization of the public sector. The authors try to develop a precedent describing the content, inhibitors and enablers of line managers role as HR agents in organizational change. This article reviewed a wide range of studies in thi s field and identified a series of enablers and inhibitors of line Managers involvement in HR process. This article is reclaimable to my study, since McGuire et al.s findings suggested that HR functions are non only performed by staff in HR department, line managers overly contribute to HRM in organizational changes. The main limitation of this study is that it does not provide any real cases show the application of their model. Therefore, whether this model is applicable to real case analysis is mollify unknown. This article depart not form the foothold of my study. However, it provides me in-chief(postnominal) clew about the role change of managers.Francis, H. (2003) HRM and the beginning of organizational change, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16, 3 309-327In this article, Francis suggested that human resource (HR) is virtually associated with polices and instruction execution issues of an organization. The author examined the role of HRM in regulating ch anging based on Ford and Fords (1995) conceptual framework. This study focuses on the role of HRM in generating talk during the process of changes and applied the framework into analysis of a large UK manufacturing firm. This article is helpful to my study since it provides me a real case to understand how HRM contribute to shift of conversation during the process of change. The main limitation of this study is that it did not suggest sequential movement under several(predicate) types of conversation. Therefore, the author suggested that further study sewer be conducted to discuss the how hard or diffused change mechanisms can be applied to different situations in align to achieve successful organizational change. This article forms the basis of my study and provides me important information about how to initiate changes by using HRM tools. attach, C. (2008) Continuity and change the role of the HR function in the modern public sector, Public Administration, 86,4 1071-1088 tie argues that the New Public Management in the UK may append significant changes to the role of human resource guidance. Therefore, the author examined whether the HR management has become more strategies based on data collected from 134 interviews with aged and middle line managers in six public sectors organizations in the UK. This study typic eachy distinguished the differences between administrative and strategic HR functions and assessed the goal to which the managers in the organizations find the roles. This study is helpful to may study, as Truss found that new strategic role and conventional role of HR managers are both required for managing changes. The major limitation of this study is the half-size sample size and the associated possibility of the generalisability of the findings. Besides, not each(prenominal) categories of public organizations were involved in this study. Thus, the author suggested larger scale studies in the future. This article forms the basis of my research. It offers important clue about the extent of change of HRM in the UK public sector. customer, D.E. and King, Z. (2004) Power, innovation and hassle-solving the personnel managers three steps to heaven? Journal of Management Studies, 41, 3 401-423.Guest and King (2004) argued that the environment changes during the past 30 old age have made Karen Legges (1978) analysis of personnels role (conformist innovator, deviant innovator and problem solver) more limited to current organizations. Thus, the authors try to explore the extent to which the role of HRM has altered. They conducted interviews with 48 senior managers in order to identify the changes. Typically, they focus on changes in features of vicious circles and the ambiguities and found that a large proportion of current HR managers failed to conquer the problems identified by Legges (1978). The major limitation of this study is also the small sample size, only 48 interviews were conducted. Thus, further study base d on a larger scale is required. This study will not form the basis of my study. However, it provides me important comparative information about how HRMs roles in the past and in current business organizations.Alfes et al.s (2010) review of precedent studies found that HR managers may play four different roles including Change Driver, Change Focused, HR Focused and Responsive within an organization. However, their own data showed that in organization A, HR managers role can be rather proactive since they are involved in all aspects of change process, such(prenominal) as help design the program and provide advice to line managers. Truss (2008) also suggested that HR managers role has become more strategic and diversified. Compared with traditional HR managers, current HR professionals are more involved in organizational changes. Since organizational change is a complex process that requires efforts from all functions of an origination, a part of the responsibility of HR managers al so shift to separate functions. McGuire et al.s (2010) study supports this point of view. They provided evidence about how line managers contribute to HRM and also discussed the enablers and inhibitors of this role sharing. Based data of organization B, Alfes et al. (2010) suggested that the role of HR managers is more responsive in this organization. They are not involved in all aspects of organizational changes. Even involved, they largely play a role as advisor, rather than change driver. The role difference of HR managers is due to different requirement of different organizations. According to As Legge (2005), HR managers can play both roles as conformist innovators and deviant innovators. The former role requires them closely follow organizational parameters, while the later role requires them to drive change within an organization through challenging prevailing norms. However, in reality, Guest and King (2004) argued that the proactive role of HR managers is less acceptable i n some organizations. Guest and King (2004) found many line managers are reluctant to accept HR managers involvement in their work. And the HR department interventions can even lead to timeconsuming procedures resented by the line managers. Thus, this requires skills of HR managers to track the relationship appropriately. Francis (2002) argued that power relations between different functions of an organization which is based on disposable resources of the parties can significantly affect the conversation during the extremity of change initiative. Inappropriate direction of conversation initiated by HR managers can become a barrier to organizational change. They further argued that conversation crosswise different functions and levels of managers should be used as a medium by HR managers in the process of negotiation. However, the author did not provide breath about how the hard or soft HR interventions can be applied. Becker and Huselid identify the key challenges associated wit h development of strategic human resource management (SHRM) through reviewing a wide range of empirical studies, they emphasize the grandeur of the nature of fit and contingencies in SHRM and argues that SHRM, which was initially an HR-centric paradigm, has gradually become a shared responsibility of HR professionals, line managers, and senior executives. The role of HR professionals in organizational change resembles to a contributor, rather than a leader. determinationTo sum up, HR managers role in organizational change can be both responsive and proactive according the demand of an organization. Geneally, HR managers role has become more strategic no matter they are proactive or responsive to organizational changes. However, to play the proactive role that gives interventions to other department or functions successfully, HR managers should pay attention to the manner of conversation.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.