Rise of the Modern State and China in a Democratic World

Rise of the Modern realm and chinaware in a egalitarian WorldRick Chelton1). What is the relationship between war and fix grammatical construction in Western Europe? Why might land-building follow a different path in the post-colonial humanness?When considering the rise of the modern severalise many political scientists and historians consider Western Europe to be an surpassing case for a variety of different reasons. These reasons tend to be affiliated to each other and can be traced back to the dominion of the papist Empire around 2,000 years ago. The roman print Empire connected thousands of miles of earth with infra organize and g everywherened them under a single political machine. After the Roman Empire was effectively destroyed by invaders and left to crumble, most of the lands that it had previously governed fell into a dark age of anarchy. Eventually this anarchy would make up into the system we call feudalism. This happened because warlords would gather math ematical groups of men and declared lordship over elfin areas of land that they could defend easily. The lords would demand payment from the peasants that resided on their land in return for protection from rival warlords. The constant threat of rival warlords created a highly competitive environment in which the organizational structure of these groups was force to rapidly evolve. Because of the volatile environment the strongest groups survived and absorbed the weaker ones. No one state was ever able to conquer the entire continent as the Romans had before, partly due to the numerous barriers that exist on the continent both geographic and ethnic in nature that limited the ability of any group to become too powerful in comparison to its rivals.The development of the State as an organizational structure led Europe to eventually commence the highest concentration of politically powerful states on the globe, because of this the states of Europe would go on to colonize the rest of the world. When the Europeans took over these colonies they would impose the organizational structure of the state by force onto the native populations. Though Europes control of their colonies would gradually deteriorate, the governing body of the state remained strong. People all around the world accepted the structure of the state as a necessary was to govern themselves. Over the socio-economic class of a few hundred years the entire world became tout ensemble covered in modern states. The reason that the emergence of states in the postcolonial world happened so quickly and with such a relatively small total of conflict was because the State was forcefully introduced to these areas. This is in contrast to Europe where it positive naturally without outside interference.2) How do developed authoritarian regimes such as mainland chinaware challenge the liberal possible action of country? Does Moores structural theory provide a better explanation for developed authoritarian states? Explain.China is the biggest challenge for the encompassing Theory of Democracy to explain because of its high level of development. Liberal theory would predict that as a federation goes by dint of economic development it would experience a cultural change that would keel its culture gradually towards democracy. Eventually the existing regime would pitch no choice but to transition to democracy or be overthrown. China goes against this theory because it has undergone a massive amount of economic change over the past couple of decades and shows no signs of slowing down. Unfortunately for this theory China has one of the strongest authoritarian regimes in the world and does not seem to be transitioning towards democracy. There are multiple authoritarian regimes similar to China, kindred Malaysia, which engender experienced large amount of economic yield but have formed strong authoritarian regimes instead of moving towards democracy. This is problematic for the Libera l Theory of Democracy, luckily we have the structural theory to turn to for cases give care this. Moores structural theory of democracy and authoritarianism states that as a society experiences large levels of economic growth it will solidify the regime if it is either authoritarian or democratic. In other words a democracy that experiences rapid economic growth will become a more(prenominal) stable. The same is true for authoritarian regimes like China, where rapid economic growth will lead to a strengthening of the authoritarian regime. This turns out to be a much better theory when considering powerful authoritarian regimes like China and Malaysia.